Authors
- Authors should present discussion of research work along with sufficient detail and references. Submitted Manuscript should not publish elsewhere.
- The authors should ensure that the submitted article is completely original, and if the works of others have been used, this has been properly cited.
- Authors are pleased to participate in the peer-review process and provide necessary modifications.
- Corresponding author should make sure that all co-authors significantly contributed to the research and there approval for the final version of the paper and its submission for publication. Declare if any funding information and conflict of interest statement.
Editors
- PureNext publishers believe that an editorial board member plays a major role in supporting the standards in Open Access Publishing.
- Editors should take responsibility for the smooth peer-review and publication process of submitted manuscripts under the journal policies.
- Editors should handle Special Issues in the same way as other submissions. He/She can review the submitted manuscripts at their feasible time and if one is not in the position to review, they can suggest other reviewers.
- The final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript is in the hands of an editor-in-chief. If the Editors found any plagarised content he/she has the right to reject the article straight away.
- Editorial Board Members are always pleased to publish their article in their respective journal and support by promoting our journal. Editor-In-Chief is responsible for journal reputation and the entire content of the journal and the peer review process. Professors, Scientists, Researchers, and Medical practitioners are welcomed to serve as guest editors.
Reviewers
- Any manuscripts received for review from editors must be treated as confidential documents.
- Reviewers should not use any information personally, which has been mentioned in the article during the peer-review process. The reviewer helps to maintain the quality of the published paper by reviewing the manuscript in a timely manner.
- Reviews should be conducted accurately and comments should be mentioned clearly with supporting arguments so that authors can use them for improving the paper.
- Reviewers can take an excuse from the editor if they feel that the assigned article is out of their research interest.
- Reviewers should be aware of conflicts of interest resulting from financial, institutional, or collaborative between the reviewer and author connected to the articles. The revisers should point out the significant published work which is not yet cited.
Our Team
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.
Journals we We Cover
Behind the word mountains, far from the countries Vokalia and Consonantia, there live the blind texts the word.
Testimonial
PureNext Publications is the new pen in the world of Publishing. It manages the design, editing, and production process with the help of proofreaders, reviewers and editors.
Our Departments
Useful Links
Our Address
- 33 Echoridge Drive, Brampton, ON L7A 3K8,Canada
- info@purnextpublishers.com